What We Might Write Next
Updated October 26, 2026. These are editorial intentions, not new publications or claims of completed product capabilities.
We will improve existing essays before adding new slugs. The nine core principles and seven on-demand engineering methods are a reading map, not fourteen article commitments.
October 26, 2026: Deepen existing articles first
The latest source and original task evidence confirm scoped Runtime locality progress for Child/Human Interaction, run-local Memory, initial Access/Exposure and Skill-session state (tasks 1.1, 2.1, 3.1, 3.2), including removal of duplicate Factory Memory internals; broader Recovery, remaining state privacy and whole-change closure are still outstanding. This is a dated follow-up to the existing retrospective, not proof of a complete refactor.
The existing Chinese Web deep-reading article should absorb the governed default dynamic-rendering fallback instead of spawning another essay. A bounded real-path concurrent-conversation qualification has also been archived, but complete financial research is a separate acceptance question. Consult the October 26 owner status.
For consolidation, preserve public legacy links and distinguish the current V3 panorama from full-text V1/V2 historical editions. Reduce overlapping context before combining essays that describe distinct capability owners.
October 25, 2026: Evidence for further publication
The bilingual custom-expert case study is now published as related reading for A07, retaining the 43-Owner count. Shadow Credits' bounded P0 account-usage engineering close is recorded; it is not a Provider invoice or release qualification.
Further retrospective work should await a genuinely reviewed fund-research result, complete expert dialogues/recovery, qualified A36 calendar usage, personal Profile acceptance or attributable E04 report cost evidence. The Runtime decoupling review and staged Spec are design work, not a shipped refactor. See the latest status board.
October 24, 2026: A08 and A30 Owner Deep Dives
A08 durable control events explains why an acknowledged delivery and an original committed effect must be reconciled separately. A30 Provider Admission explains endpoint-group capacity, leases and uncertain remote work even after HTTP 200. Both have full Chinese and English essays and preserve the limits of actual engineering acceptance.
A32 model catalog is developed further inside the existing Provider architecture guide, without adding a redundant standalone essay. A27 personalized daily research remains the one Owner with no substantial mechanism essay pending stronger user-value evidence. Of 43 Owners, 29 have dedicated essays, 13 are partially covered and 1 remains unwritten.
October 24, 2026: Three New Mechanism Essays
Durable human response adoption examines actual receipt, correction, park/wake and Child consumption; it does not claim production Human Park is on. Temporal semantics and market sessions distinguishes user dates, frozen anchors, qualified session calendars and quote as-of data; ordinary live-agent acceptance is still open. Personal Shadow Credits accounting focuses on physical-attempt identities and partial usage without introducing billing or hard quotas. E04 has optional cost-evidence projection and readback code, but complete attribution and its own acceptance remain separate.
The gallery now has 43 Owners after separately admitting A36 temporal semantics and A37 durable human interaction. Credits remains scoped accounting, not a third Runtime manager.
Existing articles to deepen
The weekly-review staged-delivery retrospective explains why comprehensive design must not delay the first usable result, and how we changed the Spec workflow.
The engineering context, memory and knowledge retirement article now incorporates the cases about obsolete instructions and tests reviving old mechanisms. Both reading paths have complete bilingual articles in the engineering collection; knowledge retirement is no longer a separate essay.
Provider architecture and shared admission and failure-domain-aware failover now have complete bilingual editions in the module and architecture collections respectively. The first covers configuration, protocols, and capacity lifecycles; the second covers failure domains, original Run authorization, and recovery. Full-application acceptance and deployment limitations remain explicit; these are no longer unwritten topics.
First: Deepen existing articles
| Priority | Existing essay | Further question |
|---|---|---|
| P0 | From bug-fixing to full task convergence | Staged delivery now has its own case study; add only distinct new observations about full research-task convergence. |
| P0 | Specs, Evidence, and reliable closeout | How can facts, authority, failure, value and verification choices improve design decisions without another mandatory checklist? |
| P1 | Sustainable architectural evolution, Chinese original | Add grounded examples of normal-path tax and genuinely retired mechanisms, without re-publishing the same argument. |
Only if an independent, evidence-backed question emerges
- Reasoning versus experiments in agent engineering. Differentiate deterministic architectural reasoning from real-model performance comparisons. Existing baselines: Specs, green tests.
- Conservative lineage versus exact output attribution. First strengthen the evidence chain, Chinese original; create a new essay only if it answers a distinct reader question.
- Who should own dependencies between experts—Prompt, Main, or Runtime? Subagents and the multi-layer outlook cover the foundations. The usage-guidance Spec proposes soft
relationHint, while a later design adds delegation guidance and autonomous updates. A new article must wait for a real upstream result → lawful downstreaminputRefs→ Main synthesis/recovery chain, a failure counterexample, and matched evidence about quality, cost, and waiting. Neither a new DAG nor a new published article exists yet.
Financial AI Research · One Editorial Backlog
The finance selection now uses four domains and fifteen second-level topics focused on securities and wealth management. Each features up to three genuinely relevant essays, including none. A full topic prompts quality review, not an automatic split.
The F01–F15 research backlog is the sole record of questions, evidence gaps and task status. F01 on research quality is the first opened issue. Next priorities include financial error cases, brokerage-app AI and employee workflows. These are editorial research directions, not implemented product features, engineering Specs or publication commitments.
Module candidates still awaiting distinct material
Durable control events now have a dedicated A08 study. Private artifact access and sharing can extend the existing HTML article when evidence merits it; meaningful personalized research outcomes still need stronger source evidence. See the detailed Chinese writing roadmap for the existing candidate list.
The first-phase structural question of source and instruction identity is now covered by the bilingual A35 case study. Formal executor completion and real-model prompt-injection resistance remain unverified; they are evidence limitations, not a second promised article.
Written articles remain in the canonical catalog, not in the preview count. Translations are available only when fully authored and checked; links marked Chinese original intentionally open the original version.